Software Industry Should Compete According To Law, Do Not Take Users As Chips.

Public opinion is in an uproar.

Quite a Tencent group shouted a great deal of interest, saying that 360 was a hooligan company, and that it was time to learn the lesson. While the 360 party swore at Tencent for being shameless, and by abducting the public interest to achieve the goal of unfair competition.

"Both companies have problems, and they all claim to be the most important users. But in the face of commercial interests, the rights and interests of users are 10 Fen."

A number of legal experts in 4 days in an interview with the "Legal Daily" reporter said that for the Tencent "two election one" approach, the act has violated the choice of the majority of users, if the interests of users are impaired, litigation can be instituted.

Tencent called for 360 to make a difference, and 360 rebuked Tencent for its frenzy.

Over the past month or so, China's largest two client software companies, Tencent and 360, have provoked the most widespread war in China's Internet history.

The fuse is 360 released in September 27th this year, "Privacy Protector", which only supported the monitoring of QQ software on that day.

Tencent immediately denied that there was a peek at user privacy, and on the second day published an article on its website that "360 browsers were suspected of using pornographic websites to promote", and 360 responded with "rumor".

After that, the two sides launched a seesaw battle around privacy issues.

In October 29th, the 360 company announced the launch of the "buckle bodyguard", calling the tool a comprehensive protection of information security for QQ users. The Tencent strongly condemned the "buckle bodyguards" to destroy the QQ function through plug-ins, and said it would pursue 360 legal liability.

During the period, both sides had popped out the form of "window" to the online user, or declared a solemn statement, or accused the other party of damaging the user's rights and interests.

The vast number of users found that their desktop has become the battleground between Tencent and 360.

Tencent or360

After a month or two of stalemate, "Tencent has no one".

In a letter to the majority of QQ users, Tencent said, "let's consider it over and over again, and decide not to let your desktop become" battleground "and give you the right to choose software.

This "right" is: to normal use of QQ, first uninstall the 360 software.

Tencent said that this is a very difficult decision, in order to ensure the safety of QQ accounts, and it must be done.

But obviously, many people do not recognize this, and the discontent with Tencent is flooding the Internet.

Many people fail to understand why the Tencent and the 360 pinch rack have caused common users to suffer. Others have suggested that users choose what kind of software they need to use.

Up to 19 November 4th, a survey of nearly 1 million 500 thousand people involved in Sina showed that 79.1% of netizens believed that the dispute between Tencent and 360 was "the two companies are in their own interests and do not consider the interests of users". If there is a need to uninstall between 360 software and QQ software, 57.5% of the network friends said they would unload QQ, 23.3% of the users chose to unload 360, others said it was unclear.

Some netizens send out such a cry: "I want to use all two, who will protect my rights and interests?"

No one is noble.

From the perspective of the situation, Tencent seems to take the lead and has the huge advantage of over 360 users.

However, some people in the industry have said that 360 is prepared for this game and the game is clear. It is not a direct deletion of the QQ plug-in, but instead of any advertisement, it avoids the suspicion of unfair competition.

No matter who has the upper hand now, neither Tencent nor 360 are noble minded. They are ignoring the basic rights and interests of the users for commercial interests, and will eventually lose both sides.

Yang Bin, deputy director of the Institute of network behavior at Tsinghua University, said that 360 said Tencent scans users' backstage to spy on privacy. The 360 anti-virus also needs to scan the backstage and collect data. There is no difference between them.

Holding similar views, there is also a long-term lawyer who is engaged in the study of network law in Shanghai cooperative law firm.

He said that from Tencent and 360 mutual "window" to depreciate the other side, they are all birds of a feather and are very bad. "In fact, in order to provide better services, collecting user data is inevitable behavior. The key is that as a responsible enterprise, various measures should be taken to protect these data, which can not be leaked, and can not be used for commercial profits."